University of Canberra
Skip to Main Content

Systematic Reviews in Health



UC now has access to JBI SUMARI - the Joanna Briggs Institute's premier software for systematic reviews.  For information about SUMARI and other systematic review software at UC, see the Article Screening page of this guide.


(UC staff and students only) Do you need access to Covidence?  Click here.

Creative Commons License
Systematic Reviews in Health by Murray Turner at University of Canberra is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

What are Systematic Reviews?

A Systematic Review is a review of a clearly formulated question that uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select, and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect and analyse data from the included studies. Statistical methods (meta-analysis) may be used to analyse and summarise the results of the included studies. Meta-analysis refers to the use of statistical techniques in a review to integrate the results of included studies.1

Systematic Reviews differ from traditional narrative reviews and the key characteristics of a systematic review are:

  • a clearly stated set of objectives with pre-defined eligibility criteria for studies
  • an explicit, reproducible methodology
  • a systematic search that attempts to identify all studies that would meet the eligibility criteria
  • an assessment of the validity of the findings of the included studies, for example through the assessment of risk of bias and
  • a systematic presentation, and synthesis, of the characteristics and findings of the included studies.

Steps of a Systematic Review

Systematic Review Step by Step

The Need for Systematic Reviews

Systematic Reviews are the "gold standard" for synthesising evidence in health because of their rigorous methodology.  They are an important source of evidence to guide the development of clinical practice guidelines and to inform clinical decision-making. More generally Systematic Reviews provide healthcare professionals, consumers, researchers, and policy makers with identified, appraised, and synthesised research-based evidence in an accessible format, therefore saving them considerable time.2


1. Higgins, P.T., & Green, S. (eds.). (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.  Chichester, England ; Hoboken, NJ : Wiley- Blackwell.  Available:

2. Mulrow, C.D. (1994). Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ 309: 597-599. Available:

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

For more detailed instruction on Conducting a Systematic Review see the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.  The latest (Version 6, 2019) edition of the Cochrane Handbook is available here.